Blog Policy

  • Comments for All Things Whistleblower should relate to the postings at hand. In the interest of legality, GAP reserves the right to remove any posting, in particular those not specifically relating to the topic at hand, or those that accuse specific persons or organizations of wrongdoing or are otherwise offensive. If you find an outside comment to be offensive, please report it as a violation by emailing the link above.

Blogs We Like

« Whistleblower Treatment Point of Contention in Georgia Senate Race | Main | Farmed Raised Fish = Organic? »

November 19, 2008

Drinking Water at Risk Because Of Natural Gas Drilling

An eye-popping report published in the Denver Post on Monday is a cause for serious concern regarding community water supplies around the country.  

A common and relatively new process called hydraulic fracturing, pioneered by Halliburton, and developed as a method of releasing natural gas, originally was considered safe by a 2004 EPA study, which found no risk posed to drinking water.

This investigative report, researched and written by the new nonprofit journalism organization ProPublica, details how it was discovered earlier this year that the process actually poses a very serious risk to public drinking water, due to the massive amounts of toxins released. From the Post:

The process has been considered safe since a 2004 study by the Environmental Protection Agency found that it posed no risk to drinking water. After that study, Congress even exempted hydraulic fracturing from the Safe Drinking Water Act. Today, fracturing is used in nine of every 10 natural-gas wells in the United States

So the use of this technology is widespread. And just how bad is it?

An investigation by ProPublica found that water contamination in drilling areas around the country is far more prevalent than the EPA asserts.

This investigation also found that the 2004 EPA study was not as conclusive as it claimed to be. A close review shows that the body of the study contains damaging information that wasn't mentioned in the conclusion. In fact, the study foreshadowed many of the problems now being reported across the country.

How could this happen? Granted, the Bush administration has used the EPA as an industry tool as much as possible since 2001. But this means the scientists knew this was a problem, but the agency went ahead anyway. Seems like if stronger whistleblower protections for federal scientists were in place, maybe more people would have spoken out about the problem.

But that’s not the worst part – the EPA scientists don’t know exactly what the problem is now, because they don’t know exactly what chemicals are used in the process. Check it out:

It is difficult to pinpoint the exact cause of each contamination or measure its spread accurately because the precise nature and concentrations of the chemicals used by industry are considered trade secrets. Not even the EPA knows exactly what's in the drilling fluids. And that, EPA scientists say, makes it impossible to vouch for the safety of the drilling process or precisely track its effects.

Meanwhile, this process has allowed for a surge in natural gas drillings across the country. And that continues to this day.

-- Dylan Blaylock

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c304453ef010535fbaf8f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Drinking Water at Risk Because Of Natural Gas Drilling:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment