Developing
countries and non-governmental organizations are determined to keep the
administration of new climate funds for developing countries away from the
World Bank because of the structure and management of the Bank's environmental
fund, the Global Environment Facility (GEF). A key stipulation of the recent
Copenhagen Accord provides a fund for global warming adaptation in developing
countries, which is likely to be structured similarly to the GEF. However, the
GEF is often criticized because of the control of donors over how money is
spent, its cumbersome administration and red tape, and the alleged usage of its
funds as political tools.
This
skepticism of the World Bank's management capabilities is well justified,
following the scandal that has unfolded involving Indian IT behemoth Satyam
Computer Services (now known as Mahindra Satyam). Satyam was banned from
providing services to the World Bank for eight years as a penalty for giving
improper benefits to staff members at the Bank and for collecting on
undocumented invoices. This banning of Satyam was also apparently never
communicated to the company's board or the SEC in the US.
Recent Comments